haaboulder.blogg.se

Intel celeron g540
Intel celeron g540










Intel Microarchitecture Based Dual-core ProcessingThe Intel Celeron G540 processor includes dual execution cores in a single processor to enable execution of parallel threads or applications simultaneously, resulting in great dual-core performance, breakthrough energy efficiency and fast system response time when running multi-threaded applications, or multiple demanding applications.I hope you will find the above numbers and text useful. I am predicting this would save around 7W as the current PSU is not as efficient as picoPSU

intel celeron g540

Replace PSU with higher effiency one namely picoPSU. Running motion software (cpu usage 20%): ~34WĬase fan is silent and cpu fan is set to 50% in bios (1200rpm) and the whole box is very, very silent and cool! Temperatures at full load during lynx are <60C RAM Kingston 2x2GB (or any other brand now is super cheap) - €25Ĭase video (not mine but you get the idea ) I can also limit power usage in bios (yet to test it)Ĭomponents are as follows and prices in Euro as of Sep 30th, 2011: Load power will be more but I will have more power when needed. At least idle power usage will be approximately the same. I chose current 32nm generation celeron instead of upcoming D2500 and D2700 32nm atoms.

intel celeron g540

I needed a generic low power home server mainly for IP camera motion detection software and other stuff such as simple backup storage, some torrents, virtual machines (testing) etc. Low power mITX 32nm celeron home server for €200 If they enabled Hyperthreading that would be another story, which is why I find it puzzling they didnt.ĭon't wanna start a new thread but I will post my mini review here do I need to explain the merits of a slower Dual core (per core) over a fast single core for the average user? OK, so it's a powerfull one for the clockspeed, but Ī: increase the spread of benchmarks, and it might not look so rosy.ī.

intel celeron g540

Considering how well the processors are doing against Zacate, I'm quite sure the decision was a strategic one. I wonder if Intel will re-enable quick sync and EIST when for the refresh in 6 months or so. The only way to run a game on any of these platforms is to go out and buy a dedicated graphics card, preferably one with CUDA so rendering and working with archives will get a huge speed boost. I personally don't see the point of even attempting to play any 3D game made in the past 4-6 years. and 8fps in Starcraft 2 while running 1280x800 at LOW quality. And when you take into account the E-350 only gets like 15fps in Farcry, Dirt. Why? The G440 beats out the E-350 by large margins in everything except for 3D rendering.












Intel celeron g540